Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 160
Filter
1.
Clin Rehabil ; 37(7): 954-963, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235407

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patient preferences are important in designing optimal rehabilitation care. The aim of this study is to assess preferences for rehabilitation care among two groups of respondents. DESIGN: An online discrete choice experiment survey was carried out. SETTING: We use data for Lebanon, a country where rehabilitation care is still underdeveloped. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who have undergone or are currently undergoing rehabilitation treatment (users) and those who have not (yet) used rehabilitation care (non-users). INTERVENTION: Patients were asked to repeatedly choose between two hypothetical rehabilitation care packages with seven different attributes: attitude of the staff, travel time to clinic, out-of-pocket costs, medical equipment, rehabilitation plan, additional lifestyle education session, and support during rehabilitation care. MAIN MEASURES: Preference heterogeneity among patients with different characteristics was investigated using random effect binary logistic regression (software package Stata 15). RESULTS: In total, 126 respondents completed the survey. The most preferred attribute was an informal and friendly attitude of the staff followed by modern medical equipment, additional lifestyle education session via eHealth, and support during the rehabilitation program via phone call or SMS. Respondents were less in favor of going to the rehabilitation clinic and paying additional out-of-pocket costs for the rehabilitation treatment. This rank order was similar between users and non-users. CONCLUSION: Preferences of patients regarding the type of program chosen (eHealth or at clinical-based) need to be included in future rehabilitation programs. Improving patient experience with rehabilitation programs by giving the best care based on a patient-centered approach is essential.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Patient Preference , Humans , Lebanon , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
East Mediterr Health J ; 29(4): 295-301, 2023 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20242316

ABSTRACT

Background: The World Health Organization has often reiterated its recommendations for the prevention of COVID-19, however, the success of these measures largely depends on public knowledge and attitudes. Aims: This study assessed the relationship between knowledge, attitude, behaviour and preventive measures for COVID-19 infection in a Lebanese population. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between September and October 2020 using the snowball sampling technique and an online self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire had 4 parts targeting sociodemographic characteristics; medical history; knowledge, attitude and practices (preventive measures and behaviours related to COVID-19); and mental health variables such as psychological distress. Two models were derived using multivariable binomial logistic regression to optimize the picture of COVID-19 correlates. Results: Our sample comprised 1119 adults. Being older, female, a regular alcohol consumer, waterpipe smoker, having low level of education, low family income, and having contact with a COVID-19 patient correlated with increased odds of ever having been diagnosed with COVID-19. Participants who had ever been diagnosed with COVID-19 had a significantly better knowledge and a higher risky practice scale [adjusted odds ratio (ORa) = 1.49; 95% CI 1.27-1.74; P < 0.001; and ORa = 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.08; P = 0.024, respectively]. Conclusion: The most important predictors of COVID-19 infection appear to be generally well-known among the general population, however, their knowledge and adherence to preventive measures should be continuously re-evaluated. This study highlights the need for greater awareness to improve precautionary behaviours among the public.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Lebanon/epidemiology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
East. Mediterr. health j ; 29(4): 295-301, 2023-04.
Article in English | WHOIRIS | ID: gwh-368524

ABSTRACT

Background: The World Health Organization has often reiterated its recommendations for the prevention of COVID-19, however, the success of these measures largely depends on public knowledge and attitudes. Aims: This study assessed the relationship between knowledge, attitude, behaviour and preventive measures for COVID-19 infection in a Lebanese population. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between September and October 2020 using the snowball sampling technique and an online self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire had 4 parts targeting sociodemographic characteristics; medical history; knowledge, attitude and practices (preventive measures and behaviours related to COVID-19); and mental health variables such as psychological distress. Two models were derived using multivariable binomial logistic regression to optimize the picture of COVID-19 correlates. Results: Our sample comprised 1119 adults. Being older, female, a regular alcohol consumer, waterpipe smoker, having low level of education, low family income, and having contact with a COVID-19 patient correlated with increased odds of ever having been diagnosed with COVID-19. Participants who had ever been diagnosed with COVID-19 had a significantly better knowledge and a higher risky practice scale [adjusted odds ratio (ORa) = 1.49; 95% CI 1.27–1.74; P < 0.001; and ORa = 1.04; 95% CI 1.01–1.08; P = 0.024, respectively]. Conclusion: The most important predictors of COVID-19 infection appear to be generally well-known among the general population, however, their knowledge and adherence to preventive measures should be continuously re-evaluated. This study highlights the need for greater awareness to improve precautionary behaviours among the public.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Lebanon , Surveys and Questionnaires , Disease Outbreaks , Betacoronavirus
4.
East. Mediterr. health j ; 29(4): 262-270, 2023-04.
Article in English | WHOIRIS | ID: gwh-368519

ABSTRACT

Background: The B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 variant results in spike gene target failure (SGTF) in reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays. Few studies have been published on the clinical impact of B.1.1.7/SGTF. Aims: To assess the incidence of B.1.1.7/SGTF and its associated clinical characteristics among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods: This observational, single-centre, cohort study was conducted between December 2020 and February 2021 and included 387 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival analysis, and logistic regression to identify risk factors associated with B.1.1.7/SGTF. Results: By February 2021, B.1.1.7/SGTF (88%) dominated the SARS-CoV-2 PCR results in a Lebanese hospital. Of the 387 eligible COVID-19 patients confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, 154 (40%) were non-SGTF and 233 (60%) were B.1.1.1.7/SGTF; this was associated with a higher mortality rate among female patients [22/51 (43%) vs 7/37 (19%); P = 0.0170]. Among patients in the B.1.1.7/SGTF group, most were aged ≥ 65 years [162/233 (70%) vs 74/154 (48%); P < 0.0001]. Independent predictors of B.1.1.7/SGTF infection were hypertension (OR = 0.415; CI: 0.242–0.711; P = 0.0010), age ≥ 65 years (OR = 0.379; CI: 0.231–0.622; P < 0.0001), smoking (OR = 1.698; CI: 1.023–2.819; P = 0.0410), and cardiovascular disease (OR = 3.812; CI: 2.215–6.389; P < 0.0001). Only non-SGTF patients experienced multi-organ failure [5/154 (4%) vs 0/233 (0%); P = 0.0096]. Conclusion: There was a clear difference between the clinical features associated with B.1.1.7/SGTF and non-SGTF lineages. Tracking viral evolution and its clinical impact is crucial for proper understanding and management of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disease Outbreaks , Betacoronavirus , Cohort Studies , Lebanon , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
5.
East. Mediterr. health j ; 29(4): 295-301, 2023-04.
Article in English | WHOLIS, WHOIRIS | ID: covidwho-2326005

ABSTRACT

Background: The World Health Organization has often reiterated its recommendations for the prevention of COVID-19, however, the success of these measures largely depends on public knowledge and attitudes. Aims: This study assessed the relationship between knowledge, attitude, behaviour and preventive measures for COVID-19 infection in a Lebanese population. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between September and October 2020 using the snowball sampling technique and an online self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire had 4 parts targeting sociodemographic characteristics; medical history; knowledge, attitude and practices (preventive measures and behaviours related to COVID-19); and mental health variables such as psychological distress. Two models were derived using multivariable binomial logistic regression to optimize the picture of COVID-19 correlates. Results: Our sample comprised 1119 adults. Being older, female, a regular alcohol consumer, waterpipe smoker, having low level of education, low family income, and having contact with a COVID-19 patient correlated with increased odds of ever having been diagnosed with COVID-19. Participants who had ever been diagnosed with COVID-19 had a significantly better knowledge and a higher risky practice scale [adjusted odds ratio (ORa) = 1.49; 95% CI 1.27–1.74; P < 0.001; and ORa = 1.04; 95% CI 1.01–1.08; P = 0.024, respectively]. Conclusion: The most important predictors of COVID-19 infection appear to be generally well-known among the general population, however, their knowledge and adherence to preventive measures should be continuously re-evaluated. This study highlights the need for greater awareness to improve precautionary behaviours among the public.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Lebanon , Surveys and Questionnaires , Disease Outbreaks , Betacoronavirus
6.
East Mediterr Health J ; 29(4): 262-270, 2023 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2322614

ABSTRACT

Background: The B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 variant results in spike gene target failure (SGTF) in reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays. Few studies have been published on the clinical impact of B.1.1.7/SGTF. Aims: To assess the incidence of B.1.1.7/SGTF and its associated clinical characteristics among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods: This observational, single-centre, cohort study was conducted between December 2020 and February 2021 and included 387 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and logistic regression to identify risk factors associated with B.1.1.7/SGTF. Results: By February 2021, B.1.1.7/SGTF (88%) dominated the SARS-CoV-2 PCR results in a Lebanese hospital. Of the 387 eligible COVID-19 patients confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, 154 (40%) were non-SGTF and 233 (60%) were B.1.1.1.7/SGTF; this was associated with a higher mortality rate among female patients [22/51 (43%) vs 7/37 (19%); P = 0.0170]. Among patients in the B.1.1.7/SGTF group, most were aged ≥ 65 years [162/233 (70%) vs 74/154 (48%); P < 0.0001]. Independent predictors of B.1.1.7/SGTF infection were hypertension (OR = 0.415; CI: 0.242-0.711; P = 0.0010), age ≥ 65 years (OR = 0.379; CI: 0.231-0.622; P < 0.0001), smoking (OR = 1.698; CI: 1.023-2.819; P = 0.0410), and cardiovascular disease (OR = 3.812; CI: 2.215-6.389; P < 0.0001). Only non-SGTF patients experienced multi-organ failure [5/154 (4%) vs 0/233 (0%); P = 0.0096]. Conclusion: There was a clear difference between the clinical features associated with B.1.1.7/SGTF and non-SGTF lineages. Tracking viral evolution and its clinical impact is crucial for proper understanding and management of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Pandemics , Lebanon/epidemiology
7.
J Immunol Res ; 2023: 7258585, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2321348

ABSTRACT

Since its emergence, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains a public health threat worldwide. While the majority of patients recover in 3-4 weeks, complications in severely ill patients, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac injury, thrombosis, and sepsis, can lead to death. Several biomarkers, in addition to cytokine release syndrome (CRS), have been associated with severe and fatal outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. The aim of this study is to assess clinical characteristics and cytokines profiles in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Lebanon. A total of 51 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were recruited between February 2021 and May 2022. Clinical data and sera were collected at two time points: at hospital presentation (T0) and last collected results during hospitalization (T1). Our results showed that 49% of participants were >60 years with males accounting for the majority (72.5%). Hypertension, followed by diabetes and dyslipidemia, were the most frequent comorbid conditions among study participants accounting for 56.9% and 31.4%, respectively. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was the only significantly different comorbid condition between intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients. Our results also showed that the median level of D-dimer was significantly elevated among patients in ICU and those who died compared to non-ICU patients and those who survived. Moreover, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly higher at T0 compared to T1 in ICU and non-ICU patients. The median level of IL-12p70 was significantly higher in patients >60 years compared to those ≤60 years (p = 0.0209). Our data are in agreement with previous reports suggesting the importance of IL-6, CRP, and IL-12p70 in the assessment of risk of severe disease and mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Male , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Cytokines , Lebanon/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , Hospitalization , Retrospective Studies
8.
Lancet Healthy Longev ; 4(5): e219-e227, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2312137

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccination is important to prevent morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19 among older Syrian refugees. We aimed to elucidate the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Syrian refugees aged 50 years or older in Lebanon and to understand their main reasons for not receiving the vaccine. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of a five-wave longitudinal study, conducted through telephone interviews between Sept 22, 2020, and March 14, 2022, in Lebanon. For this analysis, data were extracted from wave 3 (Jan 21-April 23, 2021), which included a question on vaccine safety and on whether participants intended to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, and wave 5 (Jan 14-March 14, 2022), which included questions on actual vaccine uptake. Syrian refugees aged 50 years or older were invited to participate from a list of households that received assistance from the Norwegian Refugee Council, a humanitarian non-governmental organisation. The outcome was self-reported COVID-19 vaccination status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of vaccination uptake. Validation was completed internally with bootstrapping methods. FINDINGS: 2906 participants completed both wave 3 and 5; the median age was 58 (IQR 55-64) years and 1538 (52·9%) were male. 1235 (42·5%) of 2906 participants had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The main reasons for not receiving the first dose included being afraid of its side-effects (670 [40·1%] of 1671) or not wanting the vaccine (637 [38·1%] of 1671). 806 (27·7%) of 2906 participants received the second dose of the vaccine and 26 (0·9%) of 2906 received the third dose. The main reason for not receiving the second (288 [67·1%] of 429) or third dose (573 [73·5%] of 780) was waiting for a text message for an appointment. Predictors of receiving at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine included younger age (odds ratio 0·97; 95% CI 0·96-0·98), being male (1·39; 1·19-1·62), living inside informal tented settlements (1·44; 1·24-1·66), having elementary (1·23; 1·03-1·48) and preparatory education or above (1·15; 0·95-1·40), and having a pre-existing intention to receive the vaccine (1·29; 1·10-1·50). After adjusting for optimisation, the final model, which includes these five predictors of receiving at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, showed moderate discrimination (C-statistic 0·605; 95% CI 0·584-0·624) and good calibration (c-slope 0·912; 95% CI 0·758-1·079). INTERPRETATION: There is an ongoing need to address COVID-19 vaccine uptake among older Syrian refugees by improving deployment planning and raising awareness about the importance of vaccination. FUNDING: ELRHA's Research for Health in Humanitarian Crisis Programme.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Refugees , Vaccines , Humans , Male , Female , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Lebanon/epidemiology , Syria , Longitudinal Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Vaccination
9.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(17): e32992, 2023 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2296362

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is a recent pandemic. Healthcare workers (HCW) are at high risk of acquiring the infection and transmitting it to others. Seroprevalence for COVID-19 among HCW varies between countries, hospitals in the same country and even among different departments in the same hospital. In this study, we aim to determine the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies and the seroconversion among the HCW in our hospital. A total of 203 HCW were included. The rate of conversion to seropositive was 19.7% in total, with a rate of 13.4% in female versus 25% in male. The seropositivity in the House keeping group was 83%, followed by 45% in the COVID Floor while the seropositivity in the Anesthesia was 4% and the Infection Control 0%. The highest seropositivity rate in the COVID floor, and in the intensive care unit was explained by the long time spent with the patients. While in the inhalation team and the anesthesia, the lower rates of seropositivity was due to the N95 mask wearing the whole time. Seropositivity for COVID-19 in HCW is a major public health concern. Policies should be implemented to better protect HCWs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Male , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Seroconversion , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Lebanon/epidemiology , Health Personnel
10.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 30(21): 60552-60573, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2294875

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has generated major shocks that have crippled the economic development of many countries and regions. The COVID-19 pandemic has hampered not only economic development but also global countries from achieving their sustainable development goals through various channels. Given their first experience, many countries have no guidelines for measuring the true impact of the pandemic on their economic and social development, either at the global, regional, or country level. Amid the current slow research development in this area, this study investigates the medium- and long-run impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the United Nation's achievement of sustainable development goals. The sample in the study comprises the Middle East and North African countries, including Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen. The social development goals are approximated by economic growth and human development index, which play as the dependent variables representing two models, respectively. From another aspect, independent variables are derived from three primary sectors: government, households, and healthcare providers. In estimating the model, the study implements the panel regression estimation method using multiple variance estimators. The study findings will help policymakers formulate deliberate policy plans to stabilize economic and social fluctuations in the region and to improve the performance of basic macroeconomic parameters.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Economic Development , Humans , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Africa, Northern/epidemiology , Tunisia , Lebanon
11.
Res Vet Sci ; 157: 13-16, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2266092

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has been declared in late 2019. It is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Flu-like symptoms and acute respiratory illnesses are the main manifestations of the disease. Recent studies have confirmed the susceptibility of domestic animals to SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in household pets and the importance of pets in the epidemiology of this infection remain unknown. In Lebanon, there is no epidemiological data regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection in companion animals. Thus, this investigation aimed to determine the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in household pets of Lebanon during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional study was carried out between April 2020 and February 2021. Blood samples from 145 cats and 180 dogs were collected from 12 veterinary clinics located in the North, Mount, and Beirut governorates. A validated ELISA assay was used to detect the anti- SARS-CoV-2 in the sera of the tested animals. An overall seroprevalence of 16.92% (55/325) was reported; 13.79% seroprevalence was found in cats (20/145) and 19.44% (35/180) in dogs. The young age and the cold season were significantly associated with an increased seropositivity rate to SARS-CoV-2 infection (P < 0.01). These results confirm the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in household pets, in various geographical regions in Lebanon. Although, there is a lack of evidence to suggest that naturally infected pets could transmit the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Yet, owners diagnosed with COVID-19 should limit their contact with their animals during the course of the disease to curb the risk of transmission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cat Diseases , Dog Diseases , Cats , Animals , Dogs , SARS-CoV-2 , Lebanon/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Seroepidemiologic Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/veterinary , Animals, Domestic , Antibodies, Viral , Cat Diseases/epidemiology , Dog Diseases/epidemiology
12.
J Prev Med Hyg ; 63(4): E497-E512, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2279902

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a serious public health crisis, can affect all ages, even children. This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practices of parents living in Lebanon towards the COVID-19 in children. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between June and July 2021, targeting parents living in Lebanon. The questionnaire was divided into 4 parts: socio-demographic, knowledge, attitude, and practices. A score was calculated to evaluate parents' knowledge towards COVID-19 in children. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted. Then, determinants of COVID-19 knowledge were assessed using multivariable linear regression. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 429 parents were included. The mean knowledge score was 11.28 ± 2.19 out of 15. Knowledge was significantly lower among older (p = 0.022), and single parents (p = 0.035), who don't know if COVID-19 is a serious disease (p < 0.001) and if it will be successfully controlled (p = 0.007), and higher among female parents (p = 0.006). The majority of parents had a positive attitude and good practices towards COVID-19 in children, but 76.7% of them were worried about their child getting coronavirus. About 66.9% of parents expressed their willingness to vaccinate their kids when a vaccine would be available for them, and 66.2% answered that they are sending or willing to send their children to the school or the nursery. Conclusions: Parents' knowledge about COVID-19 in children was good, but remains lower among older and single parents. Health authorities should conduct awareness campaigns to target specific groups of parents who lacked critical knowledge about COVID-19 in children.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Child , Female , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Parents , Lebanon , Vaccination
13.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 20(5)2023 02 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270002

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Adolescent refugees in Lebanon and Lebanese youth are both at high risk of suffering from reduced psychological well-being. Sport is an evidence-based strategy for improving mental and physical health, and climbing is a type of sport that may positively impact both. The aim of this study is to test the effect of a manualized, psychosocial group climbing intervention on the well-being, distress, self-efficacy, and social cohesion of adolescents in Lebanon. In addition, the mechanisms behind psychological changes will be investigated. (2) Methods: In this mixed-methods waitlist-controlled study, we are allocating a minimum of 160 participants to an intervention (IG) or a control group (CG). The primary outcome is overall mental well-being (WEMWBS) after the 8-week intervention. Secondary outcomes include distress symptoms (K-6 Distress Scale), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale; GSE), and social cohesion. Potential mechanisms of change and implementation factors are being investigated through qualitative interviews with a subgroup of 40 IG participants. (3) Conclusions: The results may contribute to knowledge of sports interventions and their effects on psychological well-being and will provide insights regarding low-intensity interventions for supporting adolescent refugees and host populations in conflict-affected settings. The study was prospectively registered at the ISRCTN platform (current-controlled trials). ISRCTN13005983.


Subject(s)
Psychological Well-Being , Refugees , Humans , Adolescent , Lebanon , Anxiety , Mental Health , Self Efficacy , Refugees/psychology
14.
J R Soc Med ; 116(1): 27-30, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2264525
16.
Front Public Health ; 10: 1045300, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2246487

ABSTRACT

Objective: Burnout is a widespread issue in healthcare for many years. Lebanon combatted political and economic crises before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, in addition to the port explosion in August 2020. The study aimed to identify the determinants of personal burnout, patient-related burnout, and work-related burnout among postgraduate medical trainees (PGMT) and evaluate its relationship with sociodemographic characteristics. Design: A cross-sectional study utilized the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) involving electronic, voluntary, and anonymous survey. The survey was completed by 188 PGMT including residents and fellows from all specialties and all levels of training. Results: The prevalence rates are 68.6% for personal burnout, 63.3% for work-related burnout, and 35.1% for patient-related burnout. Conclusion: Results improve our understanding of the phenomenon of burnout, and the role of program leadership in shaping the impact of burnout on training and promoting wellbeing of PGMT. Discussion focuses on providing potential wellbeing strategies for program directors to follow for mitigating burnout.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Humans , Lebanon/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
J Cancer Policy ; 35: 100377, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2241960

ABSTRACT

Refugees and displaced groups have been shown to face increased risk of developing advanced cancer stages. This has been shown to be evident in Lebanon, whereby refugees are detected at later stages when compared to the Lebanese population. Lebanon is one of the biggest host (per capita) of refugees worldwide, and suffers from difficult political situation, compounded by an economic crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic and a blast which hit the capital Beirut in 2020. The main determinants of poor health outcomes among migrant populations in Lebanon include a fragmented and inequitable healthcare system and legal constraints to healthcare accessibility. The health care system is largely privatised with multiple health systems operating simultaneously for different nationalities. The current multi-crisis situation has exacerbated the fragility of the health system and its ability to cope with increasing needs. On the other hand, legal constraints for refugees to obtain residency in Lebanon has also contributed to insufficient access to health care and poor health outcomes among this population. Health system reforms, improved emergency preparedness and response measures, and an ease on legal and political restrictions for the refugee populations in Lebanon are considered key policy recommendations to ensure refugees right to health in Lebanon.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Refugees , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lebanon/epidemiology , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology
18.
East. Mediterr. health j ; 29(1): 15-23, 2023-01.
Article in English | WHOIRIS | ID: gwh-366194

ABSTRACT

Background: Polymerase chain reaction is a well-known method for testing COVID-19 infection, however, refugee populations often face difficulties in accessing testing. Several structural and cultural challenges have hindered access of Syrian refugees to COVID-19 testing in Lebanon, including financial barriers, stigma, and low perception of vulnerability. Aims: To explore barriers to accessing COVID-19 testing by Syrian refugees in Lebanon. Methods: This qualitative study conducted 10 focus group discussions among Syrian refugees and 21 individual semistructured interviews with healthcare workers. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Lebanese International University, and the study followed the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: Syrian refugees in Lebanon did not consider COVID-19 testing to be important. Despite the availability of free testing services, psychological, cultural, environmental, and financial barriers hindered them from getting tested. Some of them relied on consultation with pharmacists, who were easy to access and provided symptomatic treatment without the need to test for COVID-19. Fear of stigma, deportation, and isolation were common cultural barriers. Testing was considered unnecessary because of the perception of low disease severity and an attitude of negligence towards preventive practices. The harsh economic and living conditions were of greater concern to the refugees. Conclusion: Findings from this study add to existing literature regarding the social and cultural barriers to COVID-19 testing among Syrian refugees and should be considered when tailoring health promotion campaigns to halt the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Refugees , Disease Outbreaks , Betacoronavirus , Lebanon , Syria
19.
East Mediterr Health J ; 29(1): 15-23, 2023 Jan 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2230317

ABSTRACT

Background: Polymerase chain reaction is a well-known method for testing COVID-19 infection, however, refugee populations often face difficulties in accessing testing. Several structural and cultural challenges have hindered access of Syrian refugees to COVID-19 testing in Lebanon, including financial barriers, stigma, and low perception of vulnerability. Aims: To explore barriers to accessing COVID-19 testing by Syrian refugees in Lebanon. Methods: This qualitative study conducted 10 focus group discussions among Syrian refugees and 21 individual semistructured interviews with healthcare workers. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Lebanese International University, and the study followed the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: Syrian refugees in Lebanon did not consider COVID-19 testing to be important. Despite the availability of free testing services, psychological, cultural, environmental, and financial barriers hindered them from getting tested. Some of them relied on consultation with pharmacists, who were easy to access and provided symptomatic treatment without the need to test for COVID-19. Fear of stigma, deportation, and isolation were common cultural barriers. Testing was considered unnecessary because of the perception of low disease severity and an attitude of negligence towards preventive practices. The harsh economic and living conditions were of greater concern to the refugees. Conclusion: Findings from this study add to existing literature regarding the social and cultural barriers to COVID-19 testing among Syrian refugees and should be considered when tailoring health promotion campaigns to halt the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Refugees , Humans , Refugees/psychology , Lebanon , COVID-19 Testing , Syria , Pandemics , COVID-19/diagnosis
20.
BMJ Open ; 13(1): e063668, 2023 01 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2227593

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This pre-post implementation study evaluated the introduction of fixed dose combination (FDC) medications for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) secondary prevention into routine care in a humanitarian setting. SETTING: Two Médecins sans Frontières (MSF) primary care clinics serving Syrian refugee and host populations in north Lebanon. PARTICIPANTS: Consenting patients ≥18 years with existing ASCVD requiring secondary prevention medication were eligible for study enrolment. Those with FDC contraindication(s) or planning to move were excluded. Of 521 enrolled patients, 460 (88.3%) were retained at 6 months, and 418 (80.2%) switched to FDC. Of these, 84% remained on FDC (n=351), 8.1% (n=34) discontinued and 7.9% (n=33) were lost to follow-up by month 12. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients, enrolled February-May 2019, were switched to Trinomia FDC (atorvastatin 20 mg, aspirin 100 mg, ramipril 2.5/5/10 mg) after 6 months' usual care. During the study, the COVID-19 pandemic, an economic crisis and clinic closures occurred. OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive and regression analyses compared key outcomes at 6 and 12 months: medication adherence, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) control. We performed per-protocol, intention-to-treat and secondary analyses of non-switchers. RESULTS: Among 385 switchers remaining at 12 months, total adherence improved 23%, from 63% (95% CI 58 to 68) at month 6, to 86% (95% CI 82 to 90) at month 12; mean non-HDL-C levels dropped 0.28 mmol/L (95% CI -0.38 to -0.18; p<0.0001), from 2.39 (95% CI 2.26 to 2.51) to 2.11 mmol/L (95% CI 2.00 to 2.22); mean SBP dropped 2.89 mm Hg (95% CI -4.49 to -1.28; p=0.0005) from 132.7 (95% CI 130.8 to 134.6) to 129.7 mm Hg (95% CI 127.9 to 131.5). Non-switchers had smaller improvements in adherence and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Implementing an ASCVD secondary prevention FDC improved adherence and CVD risk factors in MSF clinics in Lebanon, with potential for wider implementation by humanitarian actors and host health systems.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Lebanon/epidemiology , Pandemics , Atorvastatin/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Cholesterol
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL